In message <200104090926.CAA15269@shell17.ba.best.com> you wrote:

> At least one mirror maintainer has requested that old snapshots be purged.
> 
> > du -s -k *
> 48810   20000529
> 68252   20000620-1.5
> 83128   20001010-1.5_ALPHA2
> 60676   20010216
> 80346   20010324
> 1270    20010403-stephen-NC
> 
> Looks to me like 529 and 620 can go.
> 
> What are people's experiences with 216 and 324?
> Can we get along without one of them?
> 
> I've got 20010407-1.5T and 20010407-1.5.1_BETA in the oven,
> so at least one of 216/324 will become redundant soon and
> we should be able to torch 20001010 later on.
> 
> This email is just to open discussion; I won't remove anything without
> at least a day's warning (probably more like two days) on this list.
> 
> Todd Whitesel
> toddpw @ best.com

Hi,
I found 216 to work ok but 324, at least on my machine (RiscPC SA), did
an sed.core whenever I tried to build a kernel or src.
Could just be me of course.

Cheers
-- 
Al McGarty
Lethbridge  Alberta  CANADA