On Friday 13 April 2001  6:42 pm, Ben Harris wrote:
> In article <01041318135504.00345@pinky.paradox.demon.co.uk> you write:
> >Where would be the best place to implement it?  Seems overkill to add it
> > to cpufuncs,  I'm thinking that in identify_master_cpu might be a good
> > place (see patch at end of file)  but I'm not sure it is, or if having
> > asm in there is sensible...
>
> What's wrong with putting it in cpufuncs?  Put it in sa110_setup() (or in a
> small asm function called from there).

Doh, missed that, when I grepped for something similair I forgot I was in the 
arch/arm dir *sigh*  Yep, that's certainly the right place for it.  I'll add 
the fix there.

Cheers,
Chris