On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:01 AM, David Brownlee <abs%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, T. Makinen wrote: > >> True. There's no much reason to keep BOOTX floating around. > > 'K, how about the BOOT -> SMALL030 renaming? Sounds good to me. I think that name is more descriptive. -Tuomo