Correct me if I'm wrong, but ext2 is also non-journaling, which would 
probably be a bad thing (tm).


>From: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
>To: <daniele@ncssm.edu>
>CC: <port-dreamcast@netbsd.org>
>Subject: RE: X-Box and PS2 port candidacy
>Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:44:29 +0000 (GMT)
>
>On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 daniele@ncssm.edu wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I know we can't use the code, but do we really want a different
> > filesystem?  Some very smart people put a lot of time into it; not that 
>the
> > same couldn't be done again, but what's the point?  Also, it would seem 
>good
> > to me if an eventual linux port could share the FS on the memory cards 
>and
> > the like.
> >
>	Certainly it would make sense to have a NetBSD implementation
>	for the midori filesystem, whether or not it ends up being
>	the recommended NetBSD flash filesystem, in the same way we have
>	ext2 and ntfs filesystems.
>
>	(I've not looked at the code to really comment on the filesystem
>	:)
>
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 02:18:39AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >
> >  > >midori Linux, just released by transmeta, includes such.  As a
> >  > >non-programmer non NetBSD/Linux expert, I have to ask:  how hard 
>would
> > it be
> >  > >to support that, and is there any reason to go create another one?
> >  >
> >  > GPL.
> >
> > Also, the Linux file system stuff is TOTALLY different.  Better to
> > understand how the file system stuff works, and re-implement the ideas.
> >
> >
>
>
>		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com