On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 08:09:51PM +0100, Marcus Comstedt wrote:

 > Yes, that sounds like what I would like to have.  So if these can be
 > provided directly by the "maple" driver, then I guess we don't need
 > the "mmf" driver at all?

No, you still want the "mmf" layer to attach "found" devices at a
given port/subunit to, which would then attach e.g. mkbd, mms, mctlr,
etc. to each of its functions.

It's similar to how the original 4.4BSD/sparc SCSI code worked (attached
a "target" to each found target, and then attached "sd", "st", etc. to
each LUN on the target).

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>