Subject: Re: DC Cross-Compiling, [WAS Re: Packages Collection]
To: Adrian McMenamin <adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk>
From: M. R. Brown <mrbrown@0xd6.org>
List: port-dreamcast
Date: 11/05/2001 19:46:16
--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Adrian McMenamin <adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk> on Mon, Nov 05, 2001:
>=20
>=20
> You're gonna get me flamed here! That was deliberately not sento the list=
:->
>=20
C'mon now. Everyone knows *cough* Linux is Better (tm) *cough*.
>=20
> I have booted my DC with netBSD and even played hangman on it. But the si=
mple=20
> fact is that I see little sign of development activity here (flame away i=
f I=20
> am wrong).
>=20
> I can boot my DC into X (after a fashion) on Linux - and there seems to b=
e=20
> real development activity going on.
>=20
Seriously, LinuxDC development is only *marginally* more collaborative than
NetBSD/Dreamcast, remember there's all of two developers that actually
spend any time with the LinuxDC kernel :P.
If NetBSD/Dreamcast had a decent framebuffer, X would be available there
too ... but who the hell wants X on their Dreamcast? Seems kinda
pointless.
M. R. (closing the thread before it goes off-topic)
--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE750DoaK6pP/GNw0URAmtkAKCvZ/7Vd7yvcQPb1yIri5uwEod+ugCeJrfj
hqssmDCdKxbXeU9q7XZDL5I=
=suBJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2--