On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:04:41PM -0600, M. R. Brown wrote:
> * Mike ... <cuttingedgeys@hotmail.com> on Thu, Dec 13, 2001:
> 
> > 
> > But aside from that, does anyone have any thoughts on my ideas? Is this 
> > looking possible? Or should I be looking at KOS or Linux for DC? What is 
> > the vison for this project? And recomendations?
> > 
> 
> My suggestion?  Go with the Linux/DC camp.  Development is more active,
> even if it looks slow from the outside.  Join the #linuxdc channel on
> openprojects.net and start asking (intelligent) questions.  The folks there
> are very helpful.
> 
> M. R.

Thanks for that. 

I think you are completely wrong, and that, since the NetBSD ports
are tightly integrated, advances in other NetBSD ports benefit
NetBSD/dreamcast.  But, there again, I was never an advocate of
the "evolution" design methodology for computer software. Or the
psychic kernel debugger.

I was also personally touched that you used the resources of the
NetBSD project to denigrate all the work that has gone into the
NetBSD/dreamcast port.

Welcome to my .procmail file.