Did you commit the patch in the link to cvs yet?  I'm pretty sure my src =
is=20
from earlier this month, you posted that message back in Jan.

I do search before I post, but normally just google, which turned up noth=
ing=20
on the subject.  I've seen the mailing list archives on netbsd.org, but I=
=20
haven't seen a search interface to them.

- Pat

On February 19, 2003 07:52 am, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> In article <200302182207.45940.mlist@beholder.homeunix.net>
>
> mlist@beholder.homeunix.net wrote:
> > So, everyone else cross compiles also?
>
> At least, I've tried self-build many times (for load test).
>
> Current problems on sh3 toolchain are:
> - zic(8) compiled with optimization does not work
>   zic.c (even in src/tools/zic) needs to be compiled with -O0
>   (it seems gcc bug around udivsi3() but there is no clue yet)
> - sed(1) also requires -O0 (see usr.bin/sed/Makefile and doc/HACKS)
> - cc -O2 might have many problem (and it isn't faster than -O1?)
> - lack of libpthread (not toolchian issue)
>
> But your problem has been fixed already:
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-dreamcast/2003/01/25/0002.html
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-dreamcast/2003/01/26/0000.html
>
> "Check archives before posting, please.."
>
> > Does anyone report these compiler inconsistencies to the gnu compiler=
 dev
> > group?
>
> I guess most problems have been fixed already in
> (forthcoming) gcc-3.3, but there are a lot of changes
> from 2.95.x so it isn't easy to pull up fixes into
> our in-tree gcc. Of cource, you can report to them
> by yourself, though.
> ---
> Izumi Tsutsui
> tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp