Appologies, I don't follow gcc development.  Did they just forget to add it 
in?  Or, has the 3.x branch not had support since the begining?

I was looking at the 3.3 release notes, and I'm a bit confused.  Why does the 
compiler need to have support for OS targets?  I thought ELF was generic to 
the CPU, and the OS loaded the binary and executed based on the instructions 
generated for the CPU target?

- Pat

On March 19, 2003 08:02 pm, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 02:46  PM, Pat Wendorf wrote:
> > Just wondering what the advantages would be of using gcc 3.2 to
> > compile the
> > kernel/userland for dreamcast vs. the 2.x compiler?
>
> Nothing, GCC 3.2 does not support the sh-netbsdelf configuration.
> You'll need to wait for 3.3.
>
>          -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>