Subject: Re: Stability of 2.0_RCx?
To: None <port-dreamcast@netbsd.org>
From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
List: port-dreamcast
Date: 12/28/2004 07:35:54
In article <041228071339.M0119503@mirage.ceres.dti.ne.jp>
I wrote:
> Okay, then could you please check which part is really required?
>
> - protection by _cpu_exception_suspend()/_cpu_exception_resume() pairs
> on accesses to TLB settings in mmu*.c
> - protection by splvm()/splx() pairs on changing pv map in pmap.c
Oops, this should be:
- protection by splvm()/splx() pairs on accesses to PTE settings in pmap.c
(pv map is already protected)
> - passing protection bits to flags too on pmap_enter(9) in
> vm_machdep.c:vmapbuf()
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp