Port-evbmips archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: mips64 softfloat or hardfloat?

To: "John D. Baker" <jdbaker%mylinuxisp.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: mips64 softfloat or hardfloat?
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:00:48 +0200

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 11:18:20AM -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> I suspect, in the end, that I will need to make this item global,
> possibly along with an identical setting for "CXXFLAGS".

It should not be needed, there is something wrong with the gcc specs.
Can you please file a PR?

The cwrappers test is a good example to reproduce it ;-)

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mips64 softfloat or hardfloat?
  - From: John D. Baker
- Re: mips64 softfloat or hardfloat?
  - From: John D. Baker

References:
- mips64 softfloat or hardfloat?
  - From: John D. Baker
- Re: mips64 softfloat or hardfloat?
  - From: Michael
- Re: mips64 softfloat or hardfloat?
  - From: John D. Baker

Prev by Date: Re: building "security/sudo" on evbmips64-el?
Next by Date: Re: building "security/sudo" on evbmips64-el?
Previous by Thread: Re: mips64 softfloat or hardfloat?
Next by Thread: Re: mips64 softfloat or hardfloat?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index