> 
> On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 03:47  PM, Charles M. Hannum wrote:
> 
> > Not to dispute that point, but if ksyms is going to have a limit like 
> > this, it
> > should fail *gracefully* and not explode with strange errors.
> 
> Oh, no argument there.  It should print an error and simply not insert 
> the symbol into the tree.  I've CC'd ragge on this message to he can 
> take care of the problem :-)
> 
No problem, I'll take care of it, but it would be interesting to know 
what the oversight is so that I know what to fix :-)  Can someone
please enlighten me of what this discussion was about?

-- Ragge