Subject: Re: LKM's for some file systems
To: Michael Graff <explorer@FLAME.ORG>
From: Thomas Graichen <graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de>
List: port-i386
Date: 12/28/1995 23:28:58
hasn't Michael Graff said ? ...
> I must admit that kernel mods really complicate the system startup
> process. I mean, given a split up startup script, would you think
> that it should be which of the following?
>
> 1) One file to load the lkm and configure it, such as procfs followed
> by a mount, all in the same file
> or
> 2) One file to load the mod, then a mount_procfs or something to do
> actual mount
>
> I would think #1 is *much* simplier.
>
> Hmm. Too bad there isn't on-demand kernel module loading. Like a
> mount loads the module, an umount unloads it. THAT would be very
> cool.
>
you may look at FreeBSD which does demand-loading of filesystem-modules
t
_______________________________________________________||___________________
__||
Perfection is reached, not when there is no __|| thomas graichen
longer anything to add, but when there __|| freie universitaet berlin
is no longer anything to take away __|| fachbereich physik
__||
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery - __|| graichen@mail.physik.fu-berlin.de
___________________________||__________________graichen@FreeBSD.org_________