Subject: Re: Progress on this bug ?
To: None <mike.long@analog.com>
From: Tim Liddelow <tim@cst.com.au>
List: port-i386
Date: 04/03/1996 08:42:14
>
> I seem to remember seeing you asking about this before. Does it still
> coredump if you issue an "unlimit stacksize" command first? I'm
> assuming you use csh; under sh the equivalent command is "ulimit -s
> unlimited".
Yes, my mistake. I thought I had done an "unlimit stacksize" .. I hadn't.
However, limit stacksize 1024 causes IOT traps (atleast with 'ls'). Is
that normal ?
Cheers
Tim.
--
================================================================================
! Tim Liddelow (http://www.cst.com.au/~tim) _--_|\ !
! Software Engineer / Systems Administrator / \ !
! Creative Software Technologies \_.--.*/ !
! Phone: +61 3 9587 1444 UNIX, C++/OOP, C, X11, v !
! email: tim@cst.com.au Networking, WWW, consulting !
!===============================================================================