> >NetBSD actually does load the symbols into memory, and even keeps them
> >there if you have DDB enabled.
> 
> 	Ok, I didn't know this. Does this work with KGDB? (and, for that
> matter, is it just me, or is KGDB not really in the i386 port?)

As far as I know, there's no "really" about it.  KGDB is not in the
i386 port.  8-)


KGDB needs the symbol table on the system where KGDB is being run.
Since DDB is a "single-system, on-console" debugger, it needs the
symbols loaded in core, so that it can always get to them.

They're ... completely seperate.



cgd