>Date: 8 Apr 1997 21:18:45 -0000
>From: explorer@flame.org

>In any case, the PNP data returned seems to be bogus.  It consistantly
>crashes my machine using the pnp attachment I wrote.  I don't think it
>is something I'm doing, but...  :)
>
>Here are the resources returned from the PNP probe, with debugging enabled:
>
>16 fixed io ports: 10 address bits, alignment 1, min 0x802, max 0x802
>IRQ's supported: 3 L+
>
>16 fixed io ports: 10 address bits, alignment 1, min 0x803, max 0x803
>IRQ's supported: 4 5 7 L+

My guess is that the low and high bytes of the {min,max} figures need
to be swapped.  But even then they're somewhat odd, since usually it's
much easier to have a base address that's a multiple of the size.
-- 
Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>     <URL:http://www.shore.net/~mikel>
VLSI Design Engineer         finger mikel@shore.net for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division          CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA       (eq (opinion 'ADI) (opinion 'mike)) -> nil