>Ty Sarna wrote:
>> > Right now, I'm trying to port it into Visual C++ 5.0 (just because I'm 
>> > used to it)  if anyone has done this successfully; please let me know; 
>> > I'm having a hell of a time doing it.

>> Native compiling is by far the easiest route.  Cross-compiling from
>> another unixoid system is a bit of a job.  Trying to cross compile from
>> an MS platform is the most uh...  optimistic...  plan I've read in quite
>> some time :-)

>Hmm, anyone remember the "PCBSD" port that somebody was working on?
>(getting 386BSD binary compatibility under OS/2 wasn't it?)
>Now if only there was a NetBSD subsystem for NT.. :)

http://www.softway.com/

It's not NetBSD, but it's a full Unix subsystem for NT, and it works
pretty darn well.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Michael L. VanLoon                           michaelv@MindBender.serv.net
      Contract software development for Windows NT, Windows 95 and Unix.
             Windows NT and Unix server development in C++ and C.

        --<  Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x  >--
    NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3,
        Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32...
    NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------