>>> I personally think a sysctl is fine ... you'd need sysctl on the
>>> install floppy, of course.  I also think Perry's suggestion of allocating
>>> interrupts in reverse-order would work as well (but that might be hard,
>>> because right now the pcmcia code calls isa_intr_alloc(), and I'm not
>>> sure what changing the order of _that_ would do).
>
>That's no good.  There is hardware where irq 15 can't be used.

Sigh, I guess Perry is right.  "A sysctl it is" unless someone has a
better idea.

--Ken