Subject: Re: Laptop vagaries
To: None <rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: port-i386
Date: 08/11/1998 13:21:02
>Let me suggest something different/stupid. Could we let the boot
>program pass in the "name" of the machine. The kernel would have a
>table that adjusts whatever parameters are necessary for that machine.
>These parameters could be: allowed irqs/allowed ports/whether sb uses
>irq 5 or 7/whether "the media inserted into a floppy" bit is inverted/...
But what happens if your machine isn't in the table? Suppose we'd
done this for 1.3.2 and then Sony comes out with the VAIO, with a
different mix of reatures from any previously-supported machine.
VAIO owners are still stuck.
Same with new machines with previously-unknown combinations of
features: if we go this route the indivdual features need to be
exposed. Builtin, named tables of known combinations might help, tho.