Subject: Re: partition sizes?
To: John F. Woods <jfw@jfwhome.funhouse.com>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: port-i386
Date: 08/17/1998 12:56:44
>The suggested partition would require the MBR to tell DOS about at least
>three partitions:
>
> 0: 200MB of type "NetBSD"
> 1: 3GB of type DOS Primary
> 2: <n> of type "NetBSD"
>
>and NetBSD wants to have only one NetBSD-type partition. However, I don't
>think NetBSD actually checks that all of the NetBSD filesystems are within
>NetBSD MBR-partitions; if that's the case, then you can just point the extra
>NetBSD native partitions to the additional space after MBR-partition 1.
I'm stuck with lots of dual- or triple-boot machines.
On those, it'd make more sense to set up "small" primary MBR
partitions for DOS/ NT/Linux/whatever -- half a gig at most --
followed by BIOS-addressable partitions wiht "user" data. That way
you dont have to reinstall and recover everything when your M$
registry bite the dust. Those partitions can be secondary partitions
as long as they're BIOS- addressable.
Using a secondary partition for the main, non-root BSD partition frees
up a primary partiton without letting another OS scribble over the
NetBSD partition. Which would help a lot for multiboot setups for
other real OSes (FreeBSD, Linux). Assuming you're under the upper
limit for your controller's BIOS addressibility, that is.
Just a thought...