On Thu, 29 Oct 98 22:18:09 EST 
 rvb+@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu wrote:

 > According to Intel's site the Pro 100B (PILA8465B) is being replaced 
 > by the Pro 100+ (PILA8460).  The 100B I have has 82557 stamped on the 
 > "big" chip, while the 100+ is pretty hard to read, but the specs say
 > it is a 82558.  I think we maye have discussed these details before.

The 82558 is simply an 82557 + 82555 PHY in one package.  It's supported.

 > My question is what do I need to do to make the fxp0 driver work with
 > the 100+.  fxp0 driver seems to identify the card, find the wire address
 > and choose an irq, but I get nothing happens.  Put a 100B in the same
 > slot and it works fine.
 > 
 > I didn't see many changes to if_fxp.c recently.  The kernel I'm running
 > is from 10/10.  There was a change on 10/29 but that seems unrelated.

Is the PHY detected properly?  Can you email me dmesg output?

Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                            Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-5                                       Work: +1 650 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                             Pager: +1 650 940 5942