Subject: Re: Installing new boot blocks
To: Frederick Bruckman <fb@enteract.com>
From: Paul Goyette <paul@whooppee.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 12/11/1998 11:16:47
On Fri, 11 Dec 1998, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> You forgot to test the new boot blocks on a floppy, first. :)
Yeah - I just "assumed" that something as simple as a bootblock would
most likely work without problem.
> Once you succeed in changing the partition id, you won't be able to
> simply boot from the 1.3.2 floppy. You'll have to exit to the shell on
> the floppy, and change it back. Been there.
Yep - I figured that part out, too.
What I really wanted to know is (1) is/are known issues with the
-current bootblock code, (2) have I found some new problem (in which
case, what info is needed tohelp get it fixed), or (3) if I did
something wrong. Your response implies that (3) is the wrong answer,
which makes me feel less like a PC dummy. :)
So, is/are there known issues with -current bootblocks, or what info do
people need to figure out my problem?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette | PGP DSS Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| Network Engineer | BCD7 5301 9513 58A6 0DBC | paul@whooppee.com |
| and kernel hacker | 91EB ADB1 A280 3B79 9221 | paul.goyette@ascend.com |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------