Subject: Re: IRD
To: Mike Cheponis <mac@Wireless.Com>
From: Ken Hornstein <kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
List: port-i386
Date: 06/09/1999 09:12:24
>2) People have done SLIP over IrDA; I'm surprised PPP doesn't work.
> Usually TCP tunes the parameters over time so that half duplex is
> properly accommodated.
SLIP has absolutely no negotiation; you just send an IP packet with
(IIRC) two framing bytes. Where PPP gets hung up is the negotiation;
the LCP negotiation never completes. I believe the problem was
from the PPP daemons on both side sending responses before the
minimum turnaround time had elapsed.
>3) It -is- possible to run stock PPP over the IR port, essentially directly.
>
> (a) In the IrDA "1.0" mode, that is, async over serial a serial port, the
> only "driver" required is usually to silence the receiver while
> transmitting to prevent hearing what you send (not all IR transceiver
> chips have this property; others squelch their own receivers during
> transmission).
I am skepical; I tried this, and it lost severely. Do you know anyone that
actually made it work?
>4) That being said, I think you ought to stick to the standard IrDA
> protocols. Basically, the whole -point- is intercommunication with other
> systems. And don't forget the range of devices out there already and
> coming down the pipe with IrDA built in: Palm Pilots, Digital Cameras,
> cell phones, all WinCE PDAs, Printers, Pagers, etc.
I would agree with this.
> Oh, and I don't want to forget to mention that a top-level IrDA protocol,
> IrDA-OBEX has been chosen by the Bluetooth group as one of their
> top-level data exchange formats.
Of course, the problem with Bluetooth now is that it's too proprietary :-(
--Ken