Hi !

I agree with the fact that "LM" is not appropriate for this driver.
A better solution is a more generic hwm ("Hardware Managment") or something
similar, to include all lm or winbond chips. A big part of source for theses
chips are common, and maybe MI.
I was stuck to this point for my own driver (and never found time to ask
anyone a solution :-(. Thanks to do the things move).

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Drochner" <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>
To: <itojun@iijlab.net>
Cc: <groo@netbsd.org>; <port-i386@netbsd.org>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: lm driver


> itojun@iijlab.net said:
> > Is the driver mandatory?  GENERIC configuration does not have them,
> > and chokes in i386/i386/conf.c (can't find lmopen from *.o)...
>
> Should be fixed now. (Had to mess with i386/conf.c anyway.)
>
> btw, "lm" is quite some namespace pollution for my taste -
> shouldn't this better be "nslm" or so?


___________________________________________________________________________

L'integrite de ce message n'etant pas assuree sur Internet, la societe 
ne peut etre tenue responsable de son contenu.
Si vous n'etes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le detruire et 
d'avertir l'expediteur.

The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. 
The society cannot therefore be considered responsible for the contents.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message, then please delete 
it and notify the sender.