Subject: RE: Terminal server
To: Jenkins, Graham K \[IBM GSA\] <Graham.K.Jenkins@team.telstra.com>
From: David Woyciesjes <DAW@yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu>
List: port-i386
Date: 07/09/2001 14:21:14
How about read-only, as in CD-ROM, nounted about 1/2" back behind the front,
to hide it?
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> ----------
> From: woods@weird.com
> Reply To: port-i386@netbsd.org
> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2001 1:00 PM
> To: Jenkins, Graham K [IBM GSA]; port-i386@netbsd.org
> Subject: RE: Terminal server
>
> [ On Monday, July 9, 2001 at 15:41:09 (+0100), David Brownlee wrote: ]
> > Subject: RE: Terminal server
> >
> > If the disks in the hosts are large enough you might want to
> > consider running them with readonly filesystems - just mount
> > an mfs over /var and extract a tarfile into it during boot.
> > You gain all the performance of local disk (slightly more as
> > you do not need to update atimes), plus complete immunity from
> > those powercord pullers...
>
> Oh, yes, of course! I keep forgetting the read-only idea for some reason.
>
> Oddly I think I've tested read-only NFS mounts for /usr though....
>
> --
> Greg A. Woods
>
> +1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <gwoods@acm.org> <woods@robohack.ca>
> Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>
>
>