Subject: Re: best NIC to make samba server
To: Kazushi \(Jam\) Marukawa <jam@pobox.com>
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.3miasto.net>
List: port-i386
Date: 07/12/2001 23:25:38
> Hi,
>
> I experied slow NetBSD samba server. Then, I bought many
> NICs with a hope to improve the speed and failed. At last,
> I got good cards finally. So, I want to list them up to
> help others and hear differnt idea or opinions from others.
> I list up NICs what I put into my NetBSD box and my
> experience while I was using NetBSD as a samba server from
> Windows clients.
samba are slow stuff, not cards
> DLink DEF530-TX: This was my first card. I put two of this
> to both NetBSD server and local Windows machine. It works
> fine but slow. I changed SAMBA configuration to make it
> fast regarding to SAMBA how-to, but it doesn't help me.
>
> 3com 3C905C: It was little faster but still slow. SAMBA
> configuration tweaks doesn't work also. If I use Linux
> with this card, it works fast, so I guess NetBSD driver
> and SAMBA have mistaches here somehow. For example, 153MB
> file copy from NetBSD SAMBA server to local takes 22s, but
> copy from local to NetBSD server takes forever 489s!! FTP
> takes 18 or 19s in both directions. Clients use DEF530-TX
> and SMC 1211TX.
>
> 3com 3C905: Same as 3C905C. At this time, I tried to use
> 3C905C for server and 3C905 for client, but it also
> doesn't help me.
>
> DEC chip card: Lightening first for download (server to
> client), but as same as slow for upload. Moreover, often
> lost interrupts.
>
> Intel PILA8460 and 8465B (82557 and 82558): Works great.
> Now I can copy 153MB same file in 22s in both directions.
>
>
> The problem is all are works fine and fast for regular ftp
> connection. They doesn't work well for only the case of
> SAMBA. Is there any differences here?
>
> Anyway, I finally bought the Intel cards and they works
> fine. I suggest you to buy it. Now, I'm planing to sell
> other NICs on eBay. ;-)
>
> Regards,
> -- Kazushi
> Security check: INTRUDER ALERT!
>