Subject: Re: Which is better: rp-pppoe or mouse-pppoe?
To: Alicia da Conceicao <alicia@cyberstation.ca>
From: Simon Burge <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 10/09/2001 00:03:32
Alicia da Conceicao wrote:
> After all of this discussion regarding PPPoE, I would appreciate
> knowing the following:
>
> Which is better on NetBSD ix86:
>
> net/rp-pppoe (Roaring Penguin's PPPoE)
> net/mouse-pppoe (derMouse's PPPoE)
>
> Both NetBSD packages do PPPoE, but rp-pppoe is much larger than
> mouse-pppoe, and my Linux friends tell me that rp-pppoe uses up
> a lot of server resources when it is in use. mouse-pppoe only
> has a single program file, as opposed to the numerous files in
> rp-pppoe; does this limit its functionality in anyway?
I'm using rp-pppoe. The main reason I chose that over mouse-pppoe
was because it came with documentation :-). It's dead easy to set
up and has been working flawlessly for ~6 months.
As to resource usage, it works fine on my 16MB P100 firewall. The
total resident size of all ppp-related processes totals around 1MB.
It currently has ~2.5MB of free memory (this is a 1.5.x box).
Simon.
--
Simon Burge <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
NetBSD CDs, Support and Service: http://www.wasabisystems.com/