Dave Huang <khym@azeotrope.org> writes:

> >  It doesn't have any optimisation capabilities at all so I don't think it
> >  should be taken seriously as an alternative to gcc.
> 
> Regardless of its performance, the fact remains that there _are_ C
> compilers for NetBSD other than gcc.

 Is it able to successfully compile the NetBSD kernel and the rest of
 userland? I mean, was anyone able to boot and use the system after it was
 recompiled with lcc?

Take care,
O