Jaromir,
	I actualy do have the 1.458 version of machdep.c.  If this doesn't
work I'll just snag the sources via cvs and start over.  Thanks.

-Mike

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:

> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:28:10 +0100 (CET)
> From: Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@netbsd.org>
> To: Mike Saunders <method@method.cx>
> Cc: netbsd-current@netbsd.org, port-i386@netbsd.org
> Subject: Re: problems with Pentium 4?
> 
> Please update kernel. Make sure you have sys/arch/i386/i386/machdep.c
> rev. 1.458. There was a bug in the identify code introduced
> on -current some time ago, which should be now fixed.
> 
> Jaromir
> 
> Mike Saunders wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 	I've have a new Pentium 4 system with a Tyan Trinity S2090
> > mainboard that I'm trying to compile a new kernel on.  When I try to do
> > this the kernel builds just fine, but when I try to boot the system ends
> > up rebooting at some point.  This last time it did something a little
> > different so I thought I'd post it here:
> >  
> > 
> > Right after I see this on the console:
> > root on wd2a dumps on wd2b
> > root file system type: ffs
> >  
> > I see this:
> > uvm_fault(0xd36dc178, 0x0,0,1) -> e
> > kernel: page fault trap, code=0
> > Stopped in pid 18 (sh) at		0: invalid address
> > db>
> >  
> > Normally the system just reboots at this point.  this time it decided to
> > stop.  
> > 
> > 	Some background info on this machine.  The drives came out of a
> > Celeron system that had just been upgraded to netbsd-current.  The new
> > hardware came in, I put the drives in the new system and booted a generic
> > kernel with no problem.  When I try to boot with my custom kernel however,
> > the system won't boot.   Any ideas as to what might be causing this?  I
> > can attach my kernel configs if you'd like.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > -Mike Saunders
> > method@method.cx
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.NetBSD.org/Ports/i386/ps2.html
> -=  Those who would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserve  =-
> -=  neither liberty nor safety, and will lose both.  -- Benjamin Franklin  =-
>