On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 11:54:03AM -0500, Sean Finney wrote:
> hey, cool--didn't know that.  i think one could still be justified
> in wanting it done first though, so that when ipnat is turned on,
> it'll 'work' right away.

sysctl won't start much later I suspect

> then again i suppose there could also
> be reasons to wait too, like waiting until after the bootup finishes?

I'm not sure there are reasons reasons to wait. It's just that both
ipnat and sysctl needs to be started, but the order doesn't
matter much. 

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--