Subject: Re: Is opera6 working well for you?
To: None <port-i386@netbsd.org>
From: rob <rob_mail@fastmail.fm>
List: port-i386
Date: 04/19/2002 04:57:10
Andrew Gillham wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 05:26:20PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>>>>M$-explorer on 386SX?
>>>
>>>Netscape and Mozilla.
>>>
>>
>>or???
>>
>>Netscape 4.79 is fast
3 things!
Netscape 4.79 seems to run most reliably for me. But lacks in some
of the newer css/javascript whizz bangs etc..
Mozilla 0.9.9 crashes about every 2 hours leaving me with .core's.
Opera 5 (too affraid to go to 6) won't send multipart/form-data file
uploads.
I can't get no damn satisfaction.
Rob
>>mozilla is incredibly slow.
>
>
> Right. And I will argue that on my machines Mozilla runs _fine_ and is
> plenty fast.
>
> Of course if you want to try to run the latest and greatest stuff on a
> 486, you get what you deserve right?
>
> I could also say "Doom is fast", "Quake 2 is incredibly slow", and "Quake
> 3 Arena won't even run." That doesn't make it _FACT_ for everyone, just
> for my 486. Meanwhile my Althon + Radeon is playing Q3A fine.
>
> Could we at least have some balance to the bashing?
>
> -Andrew
>