Subject: Re: hd tuning
To: David Maxwell <david@vex.net>
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3?= Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl>
List: port-i386
Date: 06/01/2003 01:48:09
David Maxwell [Sat, May 31, 2003 at 07:35:31PM -0400]:
> I quote:
>
> "Well, it's generally considered a good idea for any self-respecting
> distribution to install itself in the kewlest, slickest, but SAFEST way
> it possibly can. The above settings are virtually guaranteed to work on
> any hardware you might throw at it. But since we know we're throwing
> something more than a dusty, 8-year-old, 16-bit multi-IO card at it[...]"
>
> The common Linux approach is "Leave settings at minimum and force the
> user to be a developer - make them fiddle with settings to increase
> performance."
>
> The NetBSD approach is "Detect the controller and HD, and automatically
> configure for the highest throughput supported by both devices."
Interesting, how come Linux beats NetBSD at the HD performance on i386
in _all_ cases?
> This machine detected an Intel 82371AB IDE controller, a Maxtor 34098H4
> and a MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8582. Although the HD supports Ultra-DMA mode
> 5, the kernel sets Ultra-DMA mode 2 because that's the best this
> controller supports.
Congratulations, I guess you belive Linux can't detect that?
--
Micha³ Pasternak :: http://pasternak.w.lub.pl
$ mv /Almo /var :: miejsce na Twoja reklame