On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:01:34AM +0200, Magnus Eriksson wrote:
>   But this is a big update.  Having something as fundamental as USB not
> working in a very common situation in something that is supposed to be a
> major release looks very bad, IMHO.  How could "working USB" not be an
> important goal for such a major version bump?

How does NetBSD 2.0 not have "working USB"? Works for me... you're
seriously overstating the issue.
-- 
Name: Dave Huang         |  Mammal, mammal / their names are called /
INet: khym@azeotrope.org |  they raise a paw / the bat, the cat /
FurryMUCK: Dahan         |  dolphin and dog / koala bear and hog -- TMBG
Dahan: Hani G Y+C 28 Y++ L+++ W- C++ T++ A+ E+ S++ V++ F- Q+++ P+ B+ PA+ PL++