Subject: Re: Network drivers in "INSTALL_TINY" (was: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/i386/conf)
To: Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.de>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: port-i386
Date: 07/05/2005 13:01:26
On Jul 5, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> # ISA network interfaces
> ate0 at isa? port 0x2a0 irq ? # AT1700
> #ec0 at isa? port 0x250 iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 # 3Com 3c503
> Ethernet
> #eg0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 9 # 3C505 ethernet cards
> #el0 at isa? port 0x300 irq 9 # 3C501 ethernet cards
> ep0 at isa? port ? irq ? # 3C509 ethernet cards
> ef0 at isa? port 0x360 iomem 0xd0000 irq 7 # 3C507
I would say 3c507 (ef) is less common than 3c503 (ec). AT1700 (ate)
and FMV-180 (fmv) probably aren't that common, either. Same with
StarLAN (ai).
> ai0 at isa? port 0x360 iomem 0xd0000 irq 7 # StarLAN
> fmv0 at isa? port 0x2a0 irq ? # FMV-180 series
> ix0 at isa? port 0x300 irq 10 # EtherExpress/16
> iy0 at isa? port 0x360 irq ? # EtherExpress PRO 10 ISA
> lc0 at isa? port 0x320 iomem ? irq ? # DEC EtherWORKS III
> (LEMAC)
> #depca0 at isa? port 0x300 iomem 0xc8000 iosiz 0x8000 irq 5 #
> DEPCA
> #le* at depca?
> #nele0 at isa? port 0x320 irq 9 drq 7 # NE2100
> #le* at nele?
> #bicc0 at isa? port 0x320 irq 10 drq 7 # BICC IsoLan
> #le* at bicc?
> ne0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 9 # NE[12]000 ethernet cards
> ne1 at isa? port 0x300 irq 10
> sm0 at isa? port 0x300 irq 10 # SMC91C9x Ethernet
> we0 at isa? port 0x280 iomem 0xd0000 irq 9 # WD/SMC Ethernet
> we1 at isa? port 0x300 iomem 0xcc000 irq 10
>
> Which of these should be commented out insted of ec(4)?
>
> Kind regards
>
> --
> Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/
> ~matthias/
>
-- thorpej