Subject: Re: can i get ver 1.130 of usb_subr.c into 3.0 kernel?
To: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
From: Paul (NCC/CS). <pts@bom.gov.au>
List: port-i386
Date: 09/07/2006 14:45:44
OK:)
it worked for Steves Wife, so it should work for me.
It "looked" like it wasn't working, but IT WAS.
despite on console:
sd0 at scsibus0 target 0 lun 0: <Apple, iPod, 1.63> disk removable
sd0(umass0:0:0:0): Check Condition on CDB: 0x00 00 00 00 00 00
SENSE KEY: Not Ready
ASC/ASCQ: Logical Unit Is in Process Of Becoming Ready
sd0: drive offline
I did
su# disklabel sd0
# /dev/rsd0d:
type: SCSI
snip//
# size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs]
d: 39063024 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 2431*)
f: 38973690 80325 MSDOS # (Cyl. 5 - 2430)
disklabel: boot block size 0
disklabel: super block size 0
so f is visible.
i changed the entry in fstab and mounted it and ran gtkpod and WALLAH!
it works.
sorry , i was misled by the original message and thought it was no good.
Thanks to all:)
Paul.
"Steven M. Bellovin" wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:06:27 +1000, "Paul (NCC/CS)." <pts@bom.gov.au>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > trying to get an ipod mounted on usb port but failing,
> > gtkpod says use: ver 1.130 of usb_subr.c
> >
> > but substituting this file for the original in the 3.0 sys source tree
> > fails to build due to some unknown C structure.
> >
> >
> > Is there a way for me to get my version of NetBSD 3.0 to
> > build with the later version of usb_subr.c?
> >
> > If I susbtitute the whole /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/* directory would it work?
> >
> >
> >
> > (ps I don't want to upgrade the whole OS again just to get the ipod to work.
> > I haven't got a spare week. I just want to rebuild the kernel , if possible. )
> >
> I think that 3.0 already has the fix included -- at least, my wife's iPod
> worked just fine on 3.0. It's simple to test: plug in your iPod. If the
> system sees it as a disk, all is well.
>
> --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
--
____________________________________________
Paul
Australian Bureau Of Meteorology
____________________________________________
"In a world without walls and fences,
who needs windows and gates ?"