Port-i386 archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Is COMPAT_LINUX required for COMPAT_20?
Hi there!
NetBS xxx.core.de 4.0 NetBSD 4.0 (BEAVER) #0: Sun Dec 16
14:36:33A
The pkgsrc/security/f-prot packages fails to run due to compat issues:
root@:~#/usr/pkg/bin/f-prot -report=foo /var/mail/
Virus scanning report - 31 March 2008 @ 14:39
F-PROT ANTIVIRUS
Program version: 4.6.8
Engine version: 3.16.16
VIRUS SIGNATURE FILES
SIGN.DEF created 26 March 2008
SIGN2.DEF created 26 March 2008
MACRO.DEF created 26 March 2008
Search: /var/mail/
Action: Report only
Files: "Dumb" scan of all files
Switches: -ARCHIVE -PACKED -SERVER -REPORT=foo
zsh: invalid system call /usr/pkg/bin/f-prot -report=foo /var/mail/
ktrace shows:
root@:~#kdump -f ktrace.out| tail
21884 1 f-prot RET open 7
21884 1 f-prot CALL compat_30___fstat13(7,0xbfbfde3c)
21884 1 f-prot RET compat_30___fstat13 0
21884 1 f-prot CALL fcntl(7,2,1)
21884 1 f-prot RET fcntl 0
21884 1 f-prot CALL
__sysctl(0xbfbfdcf4,2,0x80f3de0,0xbfbfdcf0,0,0)
21884 1 f-prot RET __sysctl 0
21884 1 f-prot CALL compat_20_fstatfs(7,0xbfbfdd3c)
21884 1 f-prot RET compat_20_fstatfs -1 errno 78 Function not
implemented
21884 1 f-prot PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL
Is that an issue in the Linux-compat?
Thank you!
--
Markus Illenseer
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index