Port-i386 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Is COMPAT_LINUX required for COMPAT_20?




Hi there!

NetBS xxx.core.de 4.0 NetBSD 4.0 (BEAVER) #0: Sun Dec 16 14:36:33A

The pkgsrc/security/f-prot packages fails to run due to compat issues:

root@:~#/usr/pkg/bin/f-prot -report=foo /var/mail/
Virus scanning report  -  31 March 2008 @ 14:39

F-PROT ANTIVIRUS
Program version: 4.6.8
Engine version: 3.16.16

VIRUS SIGNATURE FILES
SIGN.DEF created 26 March 2008
SIGN2.DEF created 26 March 2008
MACRO.DEF created 26 March 2008

Search: /var/mail/
Action: Report only
Files: "Dumb" scan of all files
Switches: -ARCHIVE -PACKED -SERVER -REPORT=foo

zsh: invalid system call  /usr/pkg/bin/f-prot -report=foo /var/mail/

ktrace shows:
root@:~#kdump -f ktrace.out| tail
 21884      1 f-prot   RET   open 7
 21884      1 f-prot   CALL  compat_30___fstat13(7,0xbfbfde3c)
 21884      1 f-prot   RET   compat_30___fstat13 0
 21884      1 f-prot   CALL  fcntl(7,2,1)
 21884      1 f-prot   RET   fcntl 0
21884 1 f-prot CALL __sysctl(0xbfbfdcf4,2,0x80f3de0,0xbfbfdcf0,0,0)
 21884      1 f-prot   RET   __sysctl 0
 21884      1 f-prot   CALL  compat_20_fstatfs(7,0xbfbfdd3c)
21884 1 f-prot RET compat_20_fstatfs -1 errno 78 Function not implemented
 21884      1 f-prot   PSIG  SIGSYS SIG_DFL


Is that an issue in the Linux-compat?

Thank you!

--
Markus Illenseer


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index