Re: Broken 6.0.1 RAIDframe

[Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost>]

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 08:49:07PM +1000, Ray Phillips wrote:
> "The normal swap area in our case is on raid0b but this can not be
> used for crash dumps as process scheduling is stopped when dumps
> happen.  Therefore we must use a real disk device.  However, nothing
> stops us from defining a dump area which overlaps with raid0b.  The
> trick here is to calculate the correct start offset for our crash
> dump area."

You didn't show us the disklabel of raid0...

Cheers,

Patrick