Re: ldt handling patch

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:05:06AM +0000, coypu%SDF.ORG@localhost wrote:
> also lacks a check for 8192 upper bound (# of LDT segments), and
> setting some values for the new segment. could that be consistent
> with the symptoms?

Only wine and some other things like it use the LDT. Normal processes
don't, since we handle e.g. TLS via a GDT entry.

Joerg