Subject: Re: Solid IIci kernel?
To: David Bushong <dbushong@cory.eecs.berkeley.edu>
From: None <sparta@imsa.edu>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 03/26/1996 08:40:29
Thus spake David Bushong:
>
>
> Hi, while I'm still fiddling with my Classic II (please work,
> video, please?).. I am setting up a friend's dad's IIci (32MB ram, 100
> disk) with NetBSD. Assuming 1.1 binaries, can anyone recommend the best
> (most solid) kernel for the IIci? (So hopefully I can set him on his
> merry way alone)
>
May I recommend GENERIC#5 from puma??? Tis the most stylish kernel for the
IIci that I have encoutnered in quite a while... It is far mroe stable than
any of the pre-Ehter/SCSI-fix kernels, and appears to actually boot with
regularity (I have been running it successfully all month)..
Anyway, the only problem is that its self-esteem isn't where it should:
NetBSD/mac68k does not trust itself to write to pram on this machine.
Certainly is a message you will see fairly often. Also, the sound on it is
extremely quiet and sometimes non-existent (darned system beep), and the
kernel will occassionally and somewhat inexplicibly drop into a white text on
black background mode which is just fine for me since I can read this much
easier. Incidentally, has any other MacBSDophile considered adding perhaps a
config option so that the kernel console could be white-on-black. MacBSD
doesn't really run on any laptops, and I know it would be at least easier for
us visually impaired types. I tried making these changes to dt, but had
little luck. I could get the text to draw in reverse, but I was missing som
sort of a function to change which drew in large blocks as when I ran the
clear command.. Thoguths?
Gene
--
Gene Skonicki "Sometimes I get so tired of this thing called life.
sparta@imsa.edu I'm not scared of dying; I'm afraid of going through
this thing twice." -Poy Dog Pondering