Subject: Re: Does mkfs trash other partitions?
To: Ken Nakata <kenn@eden.rutgers.edu>
From: Lt Avram Dorfman <dorfman@hq.af.mil>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 05/08/1996 13:36:27
Ken,
Here's how I built a new fs on just the usr partition:
1) ran mkfs, picked my drive's scsi id
2) mkfs offered three partitions: root, usr, swap. I chose usr
these are the correct partitions.
root previously had mkfs run on it
root had devices built
root had distribution installed & booted successfully
In other words, the drive was already partitioned & mkfs'd (on root &
usr). I re-ran mkfs on just usr for the reasons indicated below. At no
point did I bother running mkfs on the swap partition.
-1LT Avram Dorfman
HQ USAF Network Management
permanent email address: avram@pobox.com
"Methodological observation of the sociometrical behavior tendencies of
prematurated isolates indicates that a causal relationship exists between
groundward tropism and lachrimatory behavior forms."
On Wed, 8 May 1996, Ken Nakata wrote:
> > I've sucessfully installed all of the distribution packages for NetBSD
> > (SE/30 40MHz Daystar 8/1G), and successfully booted, etc.
> >
> > Then, I tried to mount my usr partition, and was told to fsck it first.
> > Fsck died with a floating point error (go figure). So... I decided to use
> > mkfs to build a new file system on just the partition.
> >
> > Now it doesn't even boot. It crashes, and jumps to the debugger, just
> > after checking the PRAM (right before the "which shell" prompt would come
> > up). I'm using single user mode, BTW.
>
> Can't tell what you did wrong just from this much of information.
> What did you exactly do to "build a new file system on just the
> partition"? And what are the partitions you had at the moment?
>
> ken
>