Subject: Re: disklabel
To: Mac-Port NetBSD Mailing List <port-mac68K@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Sean Sweda <sweda@us.itd.umich.edu>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 10/12/1996 22:49:15
On Fri, 11 Oct 1996 18:03:56 CDT,
Bob Nestor rearranged the electrons to say:
>Sean wrote:
>
>>Why is it that I get conflicting opinions from the MacOS Mkfs
>>utility and the kernel about the number of sectors/track on my SCSI
>>disks? Should I trust Mkfs and write a correct disklabel to the disk
>>or is this a bad idea? BTW, I newfs'd all of my filesystems
>>except for the root, and supplied the sectors/track to it through
>>the -u flag. Haven't seen any problems yet.
>
>I'm curious, is the SCSI disk in question a removable? In reading
>through the SCSI-2 documentation I see the Mode Sense command can extract
>parameters from three different sets, the "Current", "Saved", and
>"Default" values. Mkfs always extracts the "Current" set, and I'm
>thinking that for removable media which hasn't had a "Saved" set written,
>these will be zero or undefined. If I'm correct, we should be extracting
>the "Default" set for removable media if the "Current" set returns zero
>or undefined values. I'd like to check it out, but I don't have a Zip or
>SyQuest drive. I haven't looked into the type of values being extracted
>my "newfs" running under NetBSD though, so I may be off base here. Can
>anybody else shed some light on this for me?
Actually, this is a fixed geometry drive. My problem is that
FWB tells me that the drive has 111 sectors/track, but disklabel
(I'm not exactly sure how disklabel is getting its info) says that
it is only 110 sectors/track. What further complicates this is
that Seagate's own web page says that the drive is 110 sectors/track.
I went with FWB's analysis, made my partitions accordingly, and
used newfs -u 111 to make the filesystems (except for the root, which
I used Mkfs, and Mkfs pre-guessed 111 for whatever reason.)
This isn't the first time I've seen this discrepancy, as I've also got
an SE/30 with 2 identical drives which for whatever reason disklabel
thinks has much fewer sectors/track than FWB tells me.
What gives?
Sean
p.s. is it a good idea to write the "correct" disklabel?
__________________________________________________________________________
Sean Sweda : Owner, Motor City Marauders
sweda@us.itd.umich.edu : 1994 Internet Baseball League Champs
http://www.umich.edu/~sweda : http://www.ibl.org
__________________________________________________________________________