> A NetBSD server doesn't really make much sense either... a 4.4BSD-Lite
> server has already been done; Lites.

If Lites can run NetBSD binaries, then I agree.  I don't want to have
to have two separate binaries for every program I use... :-)

> What I'm saying is, if you're going to expend the effort, just port
> NetBSD to the hardware... :-)

I tend to agree with this point, too, but I suppose this is more of a
personal choice thing...

ken