Subject: Re: is anyone porting xforms?
To: None <hommes@derioc1.organik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Scott Ellis <scotte@warped.com>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 03/31/1997 11:25:04
In "Re: is anyone porting xforms?", Nico van Eikema Hommes
<hommes@derioc1.organik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> >Has anyone ported xforms, or is anyone working on it? If not, i'd be
> >interested in trying. With xforms ported, lyx could be ported (for
> >those not familiar, it's a near wysiwyg text/word processor, which can
> >generate latex). It handles equations graphically, and shows equation
> >editor as the clunky toy it is.
> >Oh, the hard part: only the binaries are distributed. There is an
> >amiga (or is it atari?) port.
The NetBSD/m68k version of XForms is built on NetBSD/Amiga afaik, but this
doesn't really matter as any of the m68k ports can use it.
>
> I've tried the most recent version (0.86 or so): the GUI builder ran out of
> the box (a bit tedious, as I have only monochrome X and no 3-button mouse),
> but building a MkLinux application failed, because some "gl" routines were
> missing (these are being called by the library). I have not yet looked into
> why this happens, or what else should be installed.
It's a bug in 0.86 of the shared library. You can extract the modules from
the .a file, and rebuild the shared lib w/o gl.o, and the problem
goes away. I've made the XForms people aware of the problem, so 0.87
(or whatever) should have this fixed.
--
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Scott Ellis // scotte@warped.com // sellis@gi.com //
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// WARNING: This signature warps time and space in its vicinity //