Subject: Re: IIci Memory Configuration & Use
To: Glen Stewart <netbsd@associate.com>
From: The Great Mr. Kurtz [David A. Gatwood] <davagatw@Mars.utm.edU>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 04/23/1997 10:10:16
On 23 Apr 1997, Glen Stewart wrote:
> I have two questions about memory use under NetBSD...
>
> 1. When my system starts, it says 20Mb of real memory: 16Mb avail
>
> - does this mean that 4Mb is being used for the system, or that
I believe so, yes. That seems fairly reasonable. I think it takes 3 or 4
on my IIsi, as well (but that kernel's _old_!).
> - along with the question above, does NetBSD care how memory in
> the two banks is organized (4-1Mb's in A, and 4-4Mb's in B);
> and how much memory can I successfully use with NetBSD?
I don't think it really cares what your memory config is, assuming it's a
valid configuration for the system. I could always be wrong, though. I
think it will support whatever the computer itself will support.
> 2. I have 20Mb of real RAM, and a 50Mb swap. I'm finding that
> when about 60 processes are running (consuming 6Mb of RAM)
> that Virtual Memory used goes up to about 45Mb. Is it safe to
> assume that more real RAM will decrease use of VM?
Probably.
> I had the idea that VM was used a). to store memory images of
> sleeping or inactive processes, and b). to "contain" active
> processes when physical RAM is completely consumed. If this
> assumption is right, then why would 45Mb of VM be allocated
> when only 6Mb of real RAM space (out of 20) is needed?
I'm not sure. Possibly, though. Somebody else could probably answer
this better than I.
> If this situation is anything like NetScape's cache, maybe I'd be
> better off to just eliminate/minimize cache and keep my real RAM
> high?
I'm pretty sure you do have to have at least as much swap as RAM. If you
run out of swap, the system will almost definitely hang....
> These questions are stimulated by trying to fix a very sluggish
> system that is too disk-I/O bound. I'm thinking that if I can
> just reduce disk I/O, the thing will run more efficiently. As it
> now stands, it gets so busy I can hardly type on it.
Eeew. What are those processes, and are you sure that they're not taking
lots more RAM than they appear to be?
Later,
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
|David A. Gatwood And Richard Cory, one calm summer night, |
|davagatw@mars.utm.edu Went home and put a bullet through his head.|
|dgatwood@globegate.utm.edu --Edwin Arlington Robinson |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|http://globegate.utm.edu http://www.utm.edu/~davagatw |
|http://mars.utm.edu/~davagatw http://www.nyx.net/~dgatwood |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/