Subject: Re: ncrscsi + sbc
To: None <port-mac68k@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Michael G. Schabert <mikeride@prez.buf.servtech.com>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 08/30/1997 01:15:02
Bill wrote:
>> On Aug 26, 10:55pm, Paul Goyette wrote:
>> >You can't have both the ncrscsi and sbcscsi drivers in the same kernel.
>> >There's only one chip (the ncr5380) and you can't have two pieces of code
>> >fighting ov er who gets to run the chip.
>>
>> I was going to say the same thing, but I also had a thought occur to
>> me -- what if there were two SCSI busses (as my dim recollection seems
>> to suggest some machines have, when they're docked)? Can we config one
>> driver for one bus and the other driver for the second bus?
>
>In principle, yes. But I think the current drivers implicitly assume
>there is only one bus (so you could have only one of each), and also
>you'd need some place else for the scsi controllers to attach (like another
>card, etc).
and Colin Wrote:
>I don't think that the SCSI controllers on the docks are any different
>than whatever is on the motherboard. Or does the dock use the mother
>board controller???
Well, besides the docking Duo's, the top-end Macs have always come with a
2-bus system. In the 68k world, this translates to the Quadra 950. The
internal and the external busses are 2 entirely separate systems, with up
to 7 nodes each. Can we have NetBSD use both an internal and an external
hard drive, or as this never come up? Granted this is a Quadra, so we
wouldn't have the need to use 2 different drivers, but I dunno if the
existense of 2 busses poses an inherent problem.
Just curious,
Mike
Bikers don't *DO* taglines.