> Kazuyoshi Kato(kaz-k) wrote:
> > 
> >   However it's lighter than twm, isn't it?  fvwm-1.24r is slightly
> > lighter, though.
 
> Uh, no.  FVWM2 is most likely _not_ lighter than twm.  Fvwm is no longer
> quite "feeble" anymore (well, it may be feeble, but it certainly no longer
> has the small memory footprint that it used to).  The big memory tradeoff
> between fvwm 1.x and twm was mainly due to dropping much of the
> customizability of twm (and some kind of difference in storing mouse
> bindings).  I have a feeling that fvwm2's increased functionality has
> upped it's memory footprint quite a bit.
> 
> Later.

  I talked about "window manager" itself, not "desktop environment"...
Well, I should explore fvwm2 more deeper, I'm still using 1.24r mainly,
anyway.
  See you.

  -- kaz-k