Subject: Re: Son of "compiling perl"
To: Colin Wood <cwood@ichips.intel.com>
From: T. Sean (Theo) Schulze <tschulze@compuserve.com>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 01/19/1998 13:41:01
On 1/19/98 6:13 PM, Colin Wood at cwood@ichips.intel.com wrote:
>> What is =
>> different, other than the method used to get the source into my machin=
e =
>> for compiling? I guess I am not following you.
>
>The difference is that packages provided by NetBSD's package system are
>supposed to be preconfigured and patched in such a way as to provide
>completely compatible NetBSD distributions. In other words, it should
>just work for you if you use the package. Of course, this is the way it=
's
>_supposed_ to work, whether this is actually observed behavior or not is=
>another story entirely ;-)
>
OK, well that is an advantage worth looking into. Guess I'm off to the =
packages!
(BTW, a recent compile of perl 5.003 on my machine failed again.)
Cheers,
Sean.
T. Sean (Theo) Schulze
71410.25@compuserve.com TSSchulze@aol.com
****************************************************
Are brain cells self-aware?
=
How do you know?
=