Subject: Re: IBM DCAS-34330 woes?
To: None <port-mac68k@NetBSD.ORG>
From: SUNAGAWA Keiki <kei@ps.yokogawa.co.jp>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 07/03/1998 11:49:25
Thanks to the help from Skeelo and Bob Nestor, this problem
was solved. Here are the summary and another one.
SUNAGAWA Keiki <kei@ps.yokogawa.co.jp> wrote:
Keiki> I purchased IBM DCAS-34330 (narrow) and tried to use
Keiki> it under NetBSD, but no success. Is anybody else
Keiki> there experienced similer problem?
* More than 3 usr partitions trigered the problem.
Here's a part of disklabel of the drive I'm currently using
DORS-32160. Disklabel says it has 8 partitions, so I
wrongly thought 8 partitions are ok. Unknown (scratch)
partitions seems to be ignored.
8 partitions:
# size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 40960 192 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 0*- 66*)
b: 163840 41152 swap # (Cyl. 66*- 333*)
c: 4127761 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 6711*)
d: 96 96 unknown # (Cyl. 0*- 0*)
e: 819200 204992 HFS # (Cyl. 333*- 1665*)
f: 131068 1269952 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 2064*- 2278*)
g: 245760 1024192 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 1665*- 2064*)
h: 2726741 1401020 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 2278*- 6711*)
Here's that of DCAS-34330. Now it's ok.
7 partitions:
# size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 40960 96 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 0*- 40*)
b: 196608 41056 swap # (Cyl. 40*- 231*)
c: 8467200 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 8252*)
d: 1024000 237664 HFS # (Cyl. 231*- 1229*)
e: 262144 2490464 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 2427*- 2682*)
f: 5714592 2752608 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 2682*- 8252*)
g: 1228800 1261664 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 1229*- 2427*)
Previously, I splitted f partition into two parts and had 4
usr partitions, and that was the problem. I didn't tested
changing partition type of d from HfS into usr partition,
though.
Keiki> I'm going to try (a) kernels with ncr driver, (b)
Keiki> upgrading my binaries to 1.3.2.
I didn't do this since my problem is solved before try.
* While handling the problem I noticed that while I'm
connecting my machine to ISP w/ modem, invoking disklabel
caused panic. It is reproducable even if accessing good
disklabels mentiond above. While PPP connection is closing,
there's no problem with invoking disklabel.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
--
SUNAGAWA Keiki <kei@ps.yokogawa.co.jp>
Happy Hacking!