Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> At 12:52 PM -0700 7/9/98, Dr. Bill Studenmund wrote:
> >What does disklabel say for sd3?
> 
> 6 partitions:
> #        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize   cpg]
>   a:  1226685      795     unknown                        # (Cyl.    1 - 1543)
>   b:    81885  1227480     unknown                        # (Cyl. 1544 - 1646)
>   c:  1309735        0      unused        0     0         # (Cyl.    0 - 1647*)
>   d:      370  1309365     unknown                        # (Cyl. 1647 - 1647*)
>   e:      328       96     unknown                        # (Cyl.    0*- 0*)
>   f:      371      424     unknown                        # (Cyl.    0*- 0*)
> disklabel: boot block size 0
> disklabel: super block size 0

You did say that this contains NetBSD partitions, right?  I'd say
something was definitely wrong with the formatting here....did you zap
these with Mkfs?
 
> Also for reference sd0 gives:
> 2 partitions:
> #        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize   cpg]
>   a:   437642       96      4.2BSD        0     0     0   # (Cyl.    0*- 1683*)
>   b:    41612   437738         HFS                        # (Cyl. 1683*- 1843*)
> disklabel: boot block size 0
> disklabel: super block size 0
> disklabel: warning, unused partition c: size 479350 offset 0

This looks more normal

> sd1 gives:
> 2 partitions:
> #        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize   cpg]
>   b:   164075       64        swap                        # (Cyl.    0*- 932*)
> disklabel: boot block size 0
> disklabel: super block size 0
> disklabel: warning, unused partition c: size 164139 offset 0

as does this

> And sd2 gives:
> 4 partitions:
> #        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize   cpg]
>   a:      451       96     unknown                        # (Cyl.    0*- 1*)
>   b:    75524   950396         HFS                        # (Cyl. 1740*- 1878*)
>   c:  1025920        0      unused        0     0         # (Cyl.    0 - 1878*)
>   d:   949849      547     unknown                        # (Cyl.    1*- 1740*)
> disklabel: boot block size 0
> disklabel: super block size 0

But this would probably also be a problem (assuming that 'a' and 'd' are
actually NetBSD partitions).  What did you use to set these up?

-- 
Colin Wood                                 cwood@ichips.intel.com
Component Design Engineer - PMD                 Intel Corporation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I speak only on my own behalf, not for my employer.