Subject: Re: Apps | pine | BitchX | sendmail
To: None <port-mac68k@netbsd.org>
From: bvjsales <bvjsales@japan.co.jp>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 08/19/1998 00:17:56
Time to give something back to the group:
Using NetBSD v1.3, I was able to download the following and have them
compile successfully on my 840AV and I'm a novice at this mind you.
PINE4.02 (this includes pine pico imapd-[support for pop2&3] and
mtest]
ircii-pana-75p1 which is the source for VERSION BitchX-75p1+ by
panasync
sendmail.8.9.1 which is the latest version of sendamil available
get PINE at ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine4.02.tar.gz
see intruction on compiling and installing these at
http://www.washington.edu/pine/tech-notes/installation.html
about halfway down the page you'll see:
Building the Pine Programs
READ THESE!
again POC
get BitchX at
ftp://ftp.bitchx.org/pub/BitchX/source/ircii-pana-75p1.tar.gz
see this page for the general flow of compiling
http://www.bitchx.com/compiling.htm
get Sendmail at
ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/sendmail.8.9.1.tar.gz
to compile sendmail after you've unpacked it go to the source README
YES, I said read the README file in $PATH/sendmail-8.9.1/src
also see http://www.iav.com/ia/unix/sendmail.html
Steps 9 thru 12 are pertinant here
POC [piece of cake]
NetBSD is usually in the build files as
<bold><underline>neb</underline></bold> just incase you are
wondering.
These all work on version 1.3
Good luck
NRT
>At 11:23 AM -0700 8/17/98, Pilots Fan wrote:
>>Is there an ftp set aside for MacBSD ports of popular apps like pine
and
>>pico? I installed the comp.tgz set, but cc and gcc are never found.
>>Therefore, nothing will compile. I tried making a symbolic link to
gcpp
>>and cpp, but neither worked. Whats the secret?
>
>I think the package system is intended to take care of this. Failing
that
>check e.g. the amiga sites. Any of the NetBSD/m68k ports can
exchange
>non-kernel binaries.
>
>As for the gcc problem: that should have worked. Your install must
have
>failed in some way. If you could post more details of version numbers
and
>your install process perhaps someone can help.
>
>Signature failed Preliminary Design Review.
>Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated.
>h.b.hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu