Subject: Re: Apps | pine | BitchX | sendmail
To: None <port-mac68k@netbsd.org>
From: bvjsales <bvjsales@japan.co.jp>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 08/19/1998 00:17:56
Time to give something back to the group:


	Using NetBSD v1.3, I was able to download the following and have them
compile successfully on my 840AV and I'm a novice at this mind you.


	PINE4.02 (this includes pine pico imapd-[support for pop2&3]  and
mtest]

	ircii-pana-75p1 which is the source for VERSION BitchX-75p1+ by
panasync

	sendmail.8.9.1 which is the latest version of sendamil available


get PINE at ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine4.02.tar.gz 

	see intruction on compiling and installing these at

		http://www.washington.edu/pine/tech-notes/installation.html

		about halfway down the page you'll see: 

		Building the Pine Programs

		READ THESE!

	again	POC



get BitchX at
ftp://ftp.bitchx.org/pub/BitchX/source/ircii-pana-75p1.tar.gz 

	see this page for the general flow of compiling

		http://www.bitchx.com/compiling.htm


get Sendmail at
ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/sendmail.8.9.1.tar.gz  

	to compile sendmail after you've unpacked it go to the source README

	YES, I said read the README file in $PATH/sendmail-8.9.1/src

	also see http://www.iav.com/ia/unix/sendmail.html

		Steps 9 thru 12 are pertinant here

	POC [piece of cake]


NetBSD is usually in the build files as 
<bold><underline>neb</underline></bold>  just incase you are
wondering.


These all work on version 1.3

Good luck

NRT

	   


>At 11:23 AM -0700 8/17/98, Pilots Fan wrote:

>>Is there an ftp set aside for MacBSD ports of popular apps like pine
and

>>pico?  I installed the comp.tgz set, but cc and gcc are never found.

>>Therefore, nothing will compile.  I tried making a symbolic link to
gcpp

>>and cpp, but neither worked.  Whats the secret?

>

>I think the package system is intended to take care of this.  Failing
that

>check e.g. the amiga sites.  Any of the NetBSD/m68k ports can
exchange

>non-kernel binaries.

>

>As for the gcc problem:  that should have worked.  Your install must
have

>failed in some way.  If you could post more details of version numbers
and

>your install process perhaps someone can help.

>

>Signature failed Preliminary Design Review.

>Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated.

>h.b.hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu